McHugh v. Jones
This text of 29 N.E.2d 76 (McHugh v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Prima facie evidence of ineligibility of one of the members of the jury to sit as a juror was disclosed by statements made outside the jury room and having no relation to the deliberations of the jury. The disclosures *536 were sufficient, even though contained in affidavits of jurors, to require the court to make inquiry as to their truth for the purpose of determining the question of eligibility. (People v. Leonti, 262 N. Y. 256.)
The order should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the negative.
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 N.E.2d 76, 283 N.Y. 534, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mchugh-v-jones-ny-1940.