McHugh Fuller Law Group, PLLC v. PruittHealth, Inc.

794 S.E.2d 150, 300 Ga. 140
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 21, 2016·No. S16A0655·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

NAHMIAS, Justice.

In March 2015, McHugh Fuller Law Group, PLLC (“McHugh Fuller”) began running a month-long, statewide Georgia advertising campaign targeting PruittHealth, Inc., f/k/a Pruitt Corporation and its affiliated nursing homes (collectively, “PruittHealth”). Pruitt-Health filed suit against McHugh Fuller under Georgia’s trademark anti-dilution statute, OCGA § 10-1-451 (b), in the Superior Court of Colquitt County, and the trial court entered a permanent injunction prohibiting McHugh Fuller from running ads about PruittHealth that include the company’s trade names, service marks, or logos. As explained below, the single advertisement that PruittHealth challenges did not violate OCGA § 10-1-451 (b). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s injunction order.

1. On March 15, 2015, McHugh Fuller, a Mississippi law firm that focuses on suing nursing homes, ran the following full-page, color advertisement in the Sunday print and online editions of the Moultrie Observer newspaper as part of a month-long, statewide ad campaign targeting nursing homes affiliated with PruittHealth, Inc.:

[141]*141

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McHugh Fuller Law Group, PLLC v. PruittHealth, Inc., 794 S.E.2d 150, 300 Ga. 140 (Ga. 2016).

794 S.E.2d 150 (McHugh Fuller Law Group, PLLC v. PruittHealth, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edible Ip, LLC v. Google, LLC
869 S.E.2d 481 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2022)
Underwood v. Bank of America Corporation
996 F.3d 1038 (Tenth Circuit, 2021)