McHome v. State
This text of 718 So. 2d 343 (McHome v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rodney McHome appeals his judgment and sentence for violation of probation. We affirm the judgment and sentence without discussion. However, we agree that the trial court did not enter an order revoking Mr. McHome’s probation, and therefore remand this case to the trial court with directions to enter a proper probation violation order specifying which condition of his probation Mr. McHome violated. See Donley v. State, 557 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Mr. McHome need not be present for this purpose.
Affirmed, but remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
718 So. 2d 343, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11934, 1998 WL 718058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mchome-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.