McHendry v. Shaffer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

McHendry v. Shaffer

89 A. 587, 242 Pa. 476, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 911

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 7, 1913·No. Appeal, No. 76·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This decree is affirmed on the legal conclusions of the learned chancellor below. The first and second sufficiently indicate the material facts upon which they are based, and the third is self vindicating. As to the fourth it need only be said that as Sarah McHendry occupied the apartment under a mere license, the proceedings be[481] fore the alderman to dispossess her were within the provisions of the Act of March 31, 1905, P. L. 87.

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This decree is affirmed on the legal conclusions of the learned chancellor below. The first and second sufficiently indicate the material facts upon which they are based, and the third is self vindicating. As to the fourth it need only be said that as Sarah McHendry occupied the apartment under a mere license, the proceedings be[481] fore the alderman to dispossess her were within the provisions of the Act of March 31, 1905, P. L. 87.

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s cost.

McHendry v. Shaffer, 89 A. 587, 242 Pa. 476, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 911 (Pa. 1913).

Pincite

89 A. 587 (McHendry v. Shaffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related