McHale v. Smolinski

133 A.D.2d 520, 519 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49990
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 133 A.D.2d 520 (McHale v. Smolinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McHale v. Smolinski, 133 A.D.2d 520, 519 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49990 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: Candidate Francina J. Cartonia filed a 68-page designating petition for Democratic nomination for Erie County Legislator (Fifteenth District) containing 998 signatures. The questionable and irregular signature-collecting process permeated the petition with fraud and it should be invalidated. Numerous violations of Election Law § 6-132 occurred. Five subscribing witnesses, whose petition sheets accounted for 656 signatures, were not, on a number of occasions, in the presence of the signatories when the signatories signed the petition as required by Election Law § 6-132 (2) (see, Matter of Tani v Luddy, 32 Misc 2d 53, 55). Nine different sheets contain the signatures of at least 17 persons who testified that someone other than the subscribing witness witnessed their signatures (see, Matter of Metzger v Eagan, 24 AD2d 719, affd 16 NY2d 837). Further, we find it incredible that two of the subscribing witnesses could have collected 160 and 101 signatures, respectively, in a period of a few hours in one evening. In addition, the record reveals at least nine clearly forged signatures. Finally, undisputed testimony shows that the candidate and those closely connected to her (her mother and father) participated in this fraudulent signature-collecting process (see, Matter of Villafane v Caban, 104 AD2d 579). The combination of these improprieties permeates the petition with fraud and casts the validity of the entire petition into doubt (see, Matter of Haskell v Gargiulo, 51 NY2d 747; Matter of Proskin v May, 40 NY2d 829). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Honan, J.—Election Law.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 21, 1987.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Schildt v. Campanella
2025 NY Slip Op 50682(U) (New York Supreme Court, Monroe County, 2025)
Matter of Saunders v. Mansouri
2021 NY Slip Op 03157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Buttenschon v. Salatino
2018 NY Slip Op 5988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A.D.2d 520, 519 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mchale-v-smolinski-nyappdiv-1987.