McHale v. Rosenblatt

184 A. 172, 56 R.I. 168, 1936 R.I. LEXIS 85
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided April 17, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After the opinion of this court was filed, the respondent, by leave of court, filed a motion for re-argument. The motion has been duly considered by the court, and as it does not contain any matter which was not fully considered by the court before delivering its opinion, the motion is denied and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McHale v. Rosenblatt, 184 A. 172, 56 R.I. 168, 1936 R.I. LEXIS 85 (R.I. 1936).

184 A. 172 (McHale v. Rosenblatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.