McHaffie v. State

522 So. 2d 1077, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1405, 1988 WL 31747
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 1988
DocketNo. 87-0247
StatusPublished

This text of 522 So. 2d 1077 (McHaffie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McHaffie v. State, 522 So. 2d 1077, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1405, 1988 WL 31747 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the merits but reverse the imposition of costs pursuant to sections 960.20 and 943.25(4) Florida Statutes (1985), because they were assessed without notice and an opportunity to be heard. See Isaiah v. State, 522 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

The reversal is without prejudice to the state’s right to attempt to obtain a cost judgment after notice and hearing.

AFFIRM IN PART; REVERSE IN PART.

DOWNEY, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Isaiah v. State
522 So. 2d 1005 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 So. 2d 1077, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1405, 1988 WL 31747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mchaffie-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.