McHaffie v. Decatur Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
This text of 435 S.E.2d 446 (McHaffie v. Decatur Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cecil E. McHaffie and Florence R. McHaffie filed an action against appellees Decatur Federal Savings and Loan Association, The Brand Banking Company and John Birts, a Brand employee. Among other things, the McHaffies claim that appellees had induced them to obtain secured loans through the use of fraud and either had or were illegally using such fraudulently obtained loan instruments to fore[400]*400close on the McHaffies’ residence. The complaint states that it is an action to quiet title and seeks equitable relief including a temporary restraining order and cancellation of various loan documents including deeds to secure debt. Following limited discovery, each of the appellees filed motions for summary judgment which were granted by the trial court. The McHaffies appeal.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the trial court that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the McHaffies, there are no genuine issues of material fact and the appellees are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the appellees.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 S.E.2d 446, 263 Ga. 399, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 3547, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mchaffie-v-decatur-federal-savings-loan-assn-ga-1993.