McGurgan v. Warden

Fourth Circuit

McGurgan v. Warden

671 F. App'x 164

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 15, 2016·No. No. 16-7028·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William McGurgan appeals the order of the magistrate judge denying as moot his motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGurgan v. Warden, No. 1:16-cv-00111-IMK-RWT (N.D.W. Va. July 20, 2016). Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

• ■ AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William McGurgan appeals the order of the magistrate judge denying as moot his motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGurgan v. Warden, No. 1:16-cv-00111-IMK-RWT (N.D.W. Va. July 20, 2016). Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

• ■ AFFIRMED

McGurgan v. Warden, 671 F. App'x 164 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 164 (McGurgan v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.