McGurgan v. Warden
This text of 671 F. App'x 164 (McGurgan v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William McGurgan appeals the order of the magistrate judge denying as moot his motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGurgan v. Warden, No. 1:16-cv-00111-IMK-RWT (N.D.W. Va. July 20, 2016). Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
• ■ AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgurgan-v-warden-ca4-2016.