McGuirl v. Commissioner

D.C. Circuit

McGuirl v. Commissioner

171 F. App'x 856

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 18, 2005

DocketNo. 05-1029

StatusPublished

This text of 171 F. App'x 856 (McGuirl v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGuirl v. Commissioner, 171 F. App'x 856 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States Tax Court and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Tax Court’s order filed October 28, 2004, be affirmed. The Tax Court properly dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States Tax Court and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Tax Court’s order filed October 28, 2004, be affirmed. The Tax Court properly dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 F. App'x 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguirl-v-commissioner-cadc-2005.