McGuirk v. City of New York
33 N.E.2d 539, 285 N.Y. 596, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1614
This text of 33 N.E.2d 539 (McGuirk v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McGuirk v. City of New York, 33 N.E.2d 539, 285 N.Y. 596, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1614 (N.Y. 1941).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch and Lewis, JJ. Dissenting: Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ., on the ground that it was a question of fact whether under all the circumstances the defendant exercised such care as was required in the exercise of ordinary prudence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 N.E.2d 539, 285 N.Y. 596, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguirk-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1941.