McGuire v. Spires

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McGuire v. Spires

214 A.D.2d 402, 625 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4224

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 214 A.D.2d 402 (McGuire v. Spires) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGuire v. Spires, 214 A.D.2d 402, 625 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis B. Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered on or about January 26, 1994, dismissing the petition, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul and vacate certain orders of Housing Court Judge Mark H. Spires, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioners may not subvert the appeals process by collaterally attacking the Civil Court’s orders, properly rendered in prior proceedings, by means of an article 78 proceeding (see, Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d 59). Moreover, while sanctions have not been requested at this point, we reiterate the previous warnings given to petitioners, both by this Court (in a related matter, see, M-6420, M-6436, App Div, 1st Dept, Jan. 19, 1993) and the IAS Court (in the order appealed from), regarding their pursuit of frivolous claims and the attendant consequences.

We have considered petitioners’ other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis B. Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered on or about January 26, 1994, dismissing the petition, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul and vacate certain orders of Housing Court Judge Mark H. Spires, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioners may not subvert the appeals process by collaterally attacking the Civil Court’s orders, properly rendered in prior proceedings, by means of an article 78 proceeding (see, Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d 59). Moreover, while sanctions have not been requested at this point, we reiterate the previous warnings given to petitioners, both by this Court (in a related matter, see, M-6420, M-6436, App Div, 1st Dept, Jan. 19, 1993) and the IAS Court (in the order appealed from), regarding their pursuit of frivolous claims and the attendant consequences.

We have considered petitioners’ other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 402, 625 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguire-v-spires-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack