McGuire v. Grangeville Savings & Trust Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

McGuire v. Grangeville Savings & Trust Co.

115 P. 18, 19 Idaho 635, 1911 Ida. LEXIS 46

DecidedMarch 30, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 115 P. 18 (McGuire v. Grangeville Savings & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGuire v. Grangeville Savings & Trust Co., 115 P. 18, 19 Idaho 635, 1911 Ida. LEXIS 46 (Idaho 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

WOODS, District Judge.

(After stating the facts.) — This appeal was prosecuted from an order of the Honorable Edgar C. Steele, judge of the second judicial district, granting respondent a new trial upon the ground that the evidence in said action is insufficient to justify the verdict of the jury.

We have examined the evidence in this case as contained in the record, and it appearing therefrom that there was no abuse of discretion upon the part of the trial court in granting the motion for a new trial, the order made in the premises should be affirmed. It is therefore directed that the order granting a new trial be and the same is hereby affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Sullivan, J., concurs; Ailshie, Presiding J., took no part in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODS, District Judge.

(After stating the facts.) — This appeal was prosecuted from an order of the Honorable Edgar C. Steele, judge of the second judicial district, granting respondent a new trial upon the ground that the evidence in said action is insufficient to justify the verdict of the jury.

We have examined the evidence in this case as contained in the record, and it appearing therefrom that there was no abuse of discretion upon the part of the trial court in granting the motion for a new trial, the order made in the premises should be affirmed. It is therefore directed that the order granting a new trial be and the same is hereby affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Sullivan, J., concurs; Ailshie, Presiding J., took no part in the decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 P. 18, 19 Idaho 635, 1911 Ida. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguire-v-grangeville-savings-trust-co-idaho-1911.