McGuire v. Central Railroad Co.

53 A. 696, 68 N.J.L. 608, 39 Vroom 608, 1902 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 59
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 10, 1902
StatusPublished

This text of 53 A. 696 (McGuire v. Central Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGuire v. Central Railroad Co., 53 A. 696, 68 N.J.L. 608, 39 Vroom 608, 1902 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 59 (N.J. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the proof, when the plaintiff rested, the court should have granted the motion of the defendant to nonsuit. If contributory negligence was not shown, it was quite clear that the plaintiff had not proven that the defendant had done any negligent act, or negligently omitted to do any act, which was the proximate cause of the injury to the plaintiff’s cattle.

Where the proof does not show negligence in either part}', the plaintiff cannot be permitted to recover from the mere fact of the accident. For the failure to nonsuit the judgment should be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A. 696, 68 N.J.L. 608, 39 Vroom 608, 1902 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguire-v-central-railroad-co-nj-1902.