McGuire v. Borough of Shenandoah

109 Pa. 613, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 568
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 11, 1885
DocketNo. 153
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 109 Pa. 613 (McGuire v. Borough of Shenandoah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGuire v. Borough of Shenandoah, 109 Pa. 613, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 568 (Pa. 1885).

Opinion

Chief Justice Mercur

delivered the opinion of the court,

Art. Y., Sec. 14, of the Constitution of 1874 declares “ in all cases of summary conviction in this Commomvealth, or of judgment in suit for a penalty before a magistrate, or court not of record, either party may appeal to such court of record as may be prescribed by law, upon allowance of the appellate court or judge thereof, upon cause shown.” Thus it appears, in the cases mentioned, the right to grant an appeal is not in the inferior court which entered the judgment. It is vested in the court of record, or a judge thereof, to Avhich the appeal is to be taken, and cause therefor must be shown to the Superior Court or judge thereof, before the appeal can be allowed.

Sect. 1 of the Act of 17th April, 1876, P. L., 29, designed to give effect to the section of the Constitution cited, provides that appeals in case of summary conviction shall be to the Court of Quarter Sessions of the county in which such magistrate shall reside; and in a suit for a penalty, to the Court of Common Pleas of the county in which said judgment shall be rendered, — in each case on allowance by the court of record or judge thereof upon such terms as to payment of costs and entering bail as the court or judge allowing the appeal shall direct. Thus the right to grant the appeal in cases like the present, is withheld from the magistrate and given only to the Superior Court. Here the Common Pleas was not asked to allow the appeal on cause shown. The application was to [617]*617have it compel the inferior court to grant it. No such power is vested in the Common Pleas. The rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue commanding the justice to grant an appeal was properly discharged.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Barnes
217 A.2d 834 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)
Schlusser v. Conrad
15 Pa. D. & C.2d 150 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1957)
Commonwealth v. Spade
64 Pa. D. & C. 121 (Juniata County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1947)
Commonwealth v. Kaufman
11 Pa. D. & C. 689 (Centre County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1929)
Commonwealth v. Kelly
11 Pa. D. & C. 656 (Crawford County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1928)
Commonwealth v. Hayes
3 Pa. D. & C. 473 (Clearfield County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1923)
Commonwealth v. Morris
2 Pa. D. & C. 19 (Fayette County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1922)
Mechanicsburg Borough v. Gray
61 Pa. Super. 95 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Commonwealth v. Spotts
45 Pa. Super. 100 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Commonwealth v. Kephart
39 Pa. Super. 524 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Commonwealth v. Luckey
31 Pa. Super. 441 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Commonwealth v. Yocum
29 Pa. Super. 428 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Commonwealth v. Fasnacht
1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 108 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1902)
Commonwealth ex rel. Allegheny County v. Hendley
7 Pa. Super. 356 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Thompson v. Preston
5 Pa. Super. 154 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
Commonwealth v. McCann
34 A. 299 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Commonwealth v. Eichenberg
21 A. 258 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 Pa. 613, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguire-v-borough-of-shenandoah-pa-1885.