McGuire, E. v. Russo, D.
This text of McGuire, E. v. Russo, D. (McGuire, E. v. Russo, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
EILEEN MCGUIRE, : No. 901 MAL 2016 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : DONALD RUSSO, DOING BUSINESS AS : LAW OFFICES OF DONALD P. RUSSO, : ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF DONALD P : RUSSO, (THE “RUSSO DEFENDANTS”), : AND DEIRDRE KAMBER TODD, DOING : BUSINESS AS FITZPATRICK LENTZ & : BUBBA P.C., DOING BUSINESS AS : KAMBER LAW GROUP, P.C., ALSO : KNOWN AS KAMBER LAW GROUP P.C., : ESQ., THE KAMBER LAW GROUP P.C., : FITZPATRICK LENTZ & BUBBA P.C., : (THE “TODD/FLB DEFENDANTS”), : : Respondents : :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Should this Court overturn its decision in Muhammad v. Strassburger, Mckenna, Messer, Shilobod & Gutnick, 587 A.2d 1346 (Pa. 1991), which bars legal malpractice suits following the settlement of a lawsuit absent an allegation of fraud, even in instances where an attorney’s negligence led to a lesser settlement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McGuire, E. v. Russo, D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguire-e-v-russo-d-pa-2017.