McGuinness v. . Rodgers Hagerty, Inc.
119 N.E. 1056, 223 N.Y. 522, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1212
This text of 119 N.E. 1056 (McGuinness v. . Rodgers Hagerty, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McGuinness v. . Rodgers Hagerty, Inc., 119 N.E. 1056, 223 N.Y. 522, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1212 (N.Y. 1918).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback and Crane, . JJ. Dissenting: Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
119 N.E. 1056, 223 N.Y. 522, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguinness-v-rodgers-hagerty-inc-ny-1918.