McGuinness v. . Rodgers Hagerty, Inc.
119 N.E. 1056, 223 N.Y. 522, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1212
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback and Crane, . JJ. Dissenting: Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McGuinness v. . Rodgers Hagerty, Inc., 119 N.E. 1056, 223 N.Y. 522, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1212 (N.Y. 1918).
119 N.E. 1056 (McGuinness v. . Rodgers Hagerty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.