McGuigan v. Hennesy

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

McGuigan v. Hennesy

138 F. 1007, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4657

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJune 9, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 138 F. 1007 (McGuigan v. Hennesy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGuigan v. Hennesy, 138 F. 1007, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4657 (circtsdny 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

I have carefully considered the brief of counsel for the plaintiff, and have reconsidered the correctness of my ruling upon the trial directing a verdict for the defendant. I am satisfied that the direction was correct, and that upon the case presented to the jury the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. Judgment is accordingly ordered for the defendant, pursuant to the verdict of the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

I have carefully considered the brief of counsel for the plaintiff, and have reconsidered the correctness of my ruling upon the trial directing a verdict for the defendant. I am satisfied that the direction was correct, and that upon the case presented to the jury the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. Judgment is accordingly ordered for the defendant, pursuant to the verdict of the jury.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 F. 1007, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguigan-v-hennesy-circtsdny-1905.