McGuffey v. Haynie, Chancellor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

McGuffey v. Haynie, Chancellor

208 S.W.2d 10, 212 Ark. 739

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 23, 1948

Docket4-8395

StatusPublished

This text of 208 S.W.2d 10 (McGuffey v. Haynie, Chancellor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGuffey v. Haynie, Chancellor, 208 S.W.2d 10, 212 Ark. 739 (Ark. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are asked to prohibit the trial court from proceeding in this cause for the asserted reason that it is without jurisdiction of parties for want of valid service. The petition is denied on authority of Twin City Lines, Inc., v. Cummings, Judge, ante, p. 569, 206 S. W. 2d 438, decided by this court December 15, 1947. Cases are there cited in support of the rule that where in preliminary proceedings factual matters are presented for the trial court’s determination, prohibition will not be predicated upon an alleged erroneous decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are asked to prohibit the trial court from proceeding in this cause for the asserted reason that it is without jurisdiction of parties for want of valid service. The petition is denied on authority of Twin City Lines, Inc., v. Cummings, Judge, ante, p. 569, 206 S. W. 2d 438, decided by this court December 15, 1947. Cases are there cited in support of the rule that where in preliminary proceedings factual matters are presented for the trial court’s determination, prohibition will not be predicated upon an alleged erroneous decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 S.W.2d 10, 212 Ark. 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguffey-v-haynie-chancellor-ark-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack