McGriff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McGriff v. State

747 So. 2d 479, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 60, 2000 WL 3825

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 5, 2000

DocketNo. 1D99-1221

StatusPublished

This text of 747 So. 2d 479 (McGriff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGriff v. State, 747 So. 2d 479, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 60, 2000 WL 3825 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order denying his motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), challenging certain conditions of probation. Because the conditions imposed do not render the sentence “illegal,” as that term is used in rule 3.800(a), and because rule 3.800(a) affords no other basis upon which the relief appellant seeks might be granted, we affirm.

JOANOS, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order denying his motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), challenging certain conditions of probation. Because the conditions imposed do not render the sentence “illegal,” as that term is used in rule 3.800(a), and because rule 3.800(a) affords no other basis upon which the relief appellant seeks might be granted, we affirm.

JOANOS, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

747 So. 2d 479, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 60, 2000 WL 3825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgriff-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.