McGriff v. Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc.

258 So. 2d 468
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 29, 1972·No. No. 71-610·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a final judgment entered by the trial court after the defendant had moved for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence; the motion had been reserved by the court, and the jury had reported its verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The question to be determined is whether a directed verdict was justified because the evidence considered as an entirety failed to prove the plaintiff’s case. Bruner v. Hart, Fla.1910, 59 Fla. 171, 51 So. 593 (1910); Jackson v. Harrell, Fla.App. 1965, 171 So.2d 633. Our review of the evidence indicates that the trial court correctly determined that the plaintiff failed to prove a breach of duty owed him by the defendant, one of the essential elements of negligence. See Abrams v. Nolan Brown Cadillac Co., Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 131.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGriff v. Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc., 258 So. 2d 468 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

258 So. 2d 468 (McGriff v. Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Miami Elevator Co.
323 So. 2d 15 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)