McGrew v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McGrew v. State

1934 OK CR 114, 36 P.2d 302, 56 Okla. Crim. 207, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 28, 1934

DocketNo. A-8769.

StatusPublished

This text of 1934 OK CR 114 (McGrew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGrew v. State, 1934 OK CR 114, 36 P.2d 302, 56 Okla. Crim. 207, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56 (Okla. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of McClain county of transporting intoxicating liquor and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail. At the time charged, defendant, in the town of Blanchard, drove an automobile to the front of the post office, stopped and made some insulting remark to the city marshal, who was standing near, who thereupon went to' the car and discovered defendant was intoxicated and abusive. He arrested defendant and ordered him to get out of the car. This defendant refused to do and the marshal attempted to take him from the car and, in doing so, discovered a quart jar partially filled with whisky. The charge in this case resulted. Counsel for defendant do *208 not question the sufficiency of the evidence, blit contend there were prejudicial remarks in the closing argument of the county attorney. Upon' an examination of the entire case, we find no material error. The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of McClain county of transporting intoxicating liquor and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail. At the time charged, defendant, in the town of Blanchard, drove an automobile to the front of the post office, stopped and made some insulting remark to the city marshal, who was standing near, who thereupon went to' the car and discovered defendant was intoxicated and abusive. He arrested defendant and ordered him to get out of the car. This defendant refused to do and the marshal attempted to take him from the car and, in doing so, discovered a quart jar partially filled with whisky. The charge in this case resulted. Counsel for defendant do *208 not question the sufficiency of the evidence, blit contend there were prejudicial remarks in the closing argument of the county attorney. Upon' an examination of the entire case, we find no material error. The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1934 OK CR 114, 36 P.2d 302, 56 Okla. Crim. 207, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgrew-v-state-oklacrimapp-1934.