McGrew v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

McGrew v. State

966 S.W.2d 266, 333 Ark. 207, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 280

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 7, 1998

DocketCR 98-426

StatusPublished

This text of 966 S.W.2d 266 (McGrew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGrew v. State, 966 S.W.2d 266, 333 Ark. 207, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 280 (Ark. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 2-2 (1997), appellant, David L. McGrew, by his attorney, W. Hunter Williams, Jr., filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Mr. Williams admitted in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Accordingly, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 2-2 (1997), appellant, David L. McGrew, by his attorney, W. Hunter Williams, Jr., filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Mr. Williams admitted in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Accordingly, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

966 S.W.2d 266, 333 Ark. 207, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgrew-v-state-ark-1998.