McGrew v. McGrew

D.C. Circuit

McGrew v. McGrew

11 F.2d 998, 56 App. D.C. 401, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2652

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 5, 1926

DocketNo. 4305

StatusPublished

This text of 11 F.2d 998 (McGrew v. McGrew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGrew v. McGrew, 11 F.2d 998, 56 App. D.C. 401, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2652 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This case was here on a former appeal. McGrew v. McGrew, 54 App. D. C. 331, 299 F. 204. It is conceded on all sides that the identical questions are again raised that were present and decided in the former ease. Counsel for plaintiff in open court stated that, if consistency were indulged by the court, affirmance must necessarily follow. We find no occasion to depart from the well-established procedure in this particular.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This case was here on a former appeal. McGrew v. McGrew, 54 App. D. C. 331, 299 F. 204. It is conceded on all sides that the identical questions are again raised that were present and decided in the former ease. Counsel for plaintiff in open court stated that, if consistency were indulged by the court, affirmance must necessarily follow. We find no occasion to depart from the well-established procedure in this particular.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F.2d 998, 56 App. D.C. 401, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgrew-v-mcgrew-cadc-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack