McGrew v. McGrew

D.C. Circuit

McGrew v. McGrew

11 F.2d 998, 56 App. D.C. 401, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2652

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McGrew v. McGrew. Read the opinion of the Court — 298 F. 204 →

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 5, 1926·No. No. 4305·Published

Opinion

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This case was here on a former appeal. McGrew v. McGrew, 54 App. D. C. 331, 299 F. 204. It is conceded on all sides that the identical questions are again raised that were present and decided in the former ease. Counsel for plaintiff in open court stated that, if consistency were indulged by the court, affirmance must necessarily follow. We find no occasion to depart from the well-established procedure in this particular.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This case was here on a former appeal. McGrew v. McGrew, 54 App. D. C. 331, 299 F. 204. It is conceded on all sides that the identical questions are again raised that were present and decided in the former ease. Counsel for plaintiff in open court stated that, if consistency were indulged by the court, affirmance must necessarily follow. We find no occasion to depart from the well-established procedure in this particular.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

McGrew v. McGrew, 11 F.2d 998, 56 App. D.C. 401, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2652 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

Pincite

11 F.2d 998 (McGrew v. McGrew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related