McGregory v. Prescott

59 Allen 67
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1849
StatusPublished

This text of 59 Allen 67 (McGregory v. Prescott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGregory v. Prescott, 59 Allen 67 (Mass. 1849).

Opinion

By the Court.

The defendant had no right to require of the judge an opinion upon the weight and sufficiency of the evidence to support the plaintiff’s case, or whether the plaintiff had made out a primd facie case, unless he meant to leave the case on that evidence to the jury, under the direction of the court. Treating it as a motion for a nonsuit, the defendant waived it by offering evidence on his part.

As to the exception, that the plaintiff had set out no breach in his declaration, a breach is sufficiently averred in the declaration, by requesting performance in the terms of the contract. As to the further objection, that the plaintiff gave no evidence of the non-performance, it is against first principles. On an affirmative contract being proved to pay money or perform some duty, it is incumbent on the defendant to prove payment, performance or tender, or an excuse therefrom.

Exceptions overruled, with double costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 Allen 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgregory-v-prescott-mass-1849.