McGregor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McGregor v. State

1986 OK CR 144, 728 P.2d 846, 1986 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 24, 1986

DocketNo. F-84-483

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1986 OK CR 144 (McGregor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGregor v. State, 1986 OK CR 144, 728 P.2d 846, 1986 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361 (Okla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER REMANDING FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

The appellant, Billy Keith McGregor, was found guilty of First Degree Murder (21 O.S.1981, § 701.7) and sentenced to death in the District Court of Hughes County, Case No. CRF-83-58.

Prior to trial, defense counsel requested that a psychiatrist or psychologist be appointed to examine the appellant to evaluate the possibility of an insanity defense and to provide certain mitigating evidence concerning appellant’s mental condition. The motion was denied, apparently on the basis that the judge believed he was without authority to make such an appointment. Since then, the Honorable United States Supreme Court has declared that the federal constitution requires that the State, at a minimum, assure the defendant access to a competent psychiatrist if the defendant demonstrates to the trial judge that his sanity at the time of the offense is to be a significant factor at trial. Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 1097, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985).

Although defense counsel did not make an exemplary record on this issue, appellate counsel has presented a substantial amount of evidence that leads this Court to believe there is a grave risk that the sanity issue was inaccurately resolved. See Ake, 105 S.Ct. at 1096.

NOW THEREFORE, after considering the matters presented to this Court and being sufficiently advised in the premises, this Court finds that this appeal should be remanded to the Hughes County District Court for the purpose of conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine whether, under the holding of Ake, the appellant was entitled to a court-appointed psychiatrist.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ED PARKS, P.J.

TOM BRETT, J.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER REMANDING FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

The appellant, Billy Keith McGregor, was found guilty of First Degree Murder (21 O.S.1981, § 701.7) and sentenced to death in the District Court of Hughes County, Case No. CRF-83-58.

Prior to trial, defense counsel requested that a psychiatrist or psychologist be appointed to examine the appellant to evaluate the possibility of an insanity defense and to provide certain mitigating evidence concerning appellant’s mental condition. The motion was denied, apparently on the basis that the judge believed he was without authority to make such an appointment. Since then, the Honorable United States Supreme Court has declared that the federal constitution requires that the State, at a minimum, assure the defendant access to a competent psychiatrist if the defendant demonstrates to the trial judge that his sanity at the time of the offense is to be a significant factor at trial. Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 1097, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985).

Although defense counsel did not make an exemplary record on this issue, appellate counsel has presented a substantial amount of evidence that leads this Court to believe there is a grave risk that the sanity issue was inaccurately resolved. See Ake, 105 S.Ct. at 1096.

NOW THEREFORE, after considering the matters presented to this Court and being sufficiently advised in the premises, this Court finds that this appeal should be remanded to the Hughes County District Court for the purpose of conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine whether, under the holding of Ake, the appellant was entitled to a court-appointed psychiatrist.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ED PARKS, P.J.

TOM BRETT, J.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1986 OK CR 144, 728 P.2d 846, 1986 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgregor-v-state-oklacrimapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack