McGregor v. Matthis

32 Ga. 417
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 32 Ga. 417 (McGregor v. Matthis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGregor v. Matthis, 32 Ga. 417 (Ga. 1861).

Opinion

[418]*418 By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

From the time that Crumpton transferred the note to Fi.eld and Lemon, he ceased to have any interest in the land, (Tompkins vs. Williams, 19th Ga. Reports, 569,) and the deed being executed to Shelton afterwards, can make no difference. In the case of Ware ?against Jackson, (19th Georgia Reports, 452,) one of the Court who gave the majority opinion in that case, said, “ Had the note been transferred by Baker, (the vendor,) for a valuable consideration, to a bona fide holder, the case would have been different.” Indeed, in the case supposed, the Court would doubtless have been concurrent. That is this case'.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stecker v. Snyder
193 P.2d 881 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1948)
Gholston Bros. v. Northeastern Banking Co.
123 S.E. 111 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Lumpkin v. Greenlea
78 S.E. 1003 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Gould v. Bank of Statesboro
31 S.E. 548 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Cade v. Jenkins
15 S.E. 292 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)
Thomas v. American Freehold Land & Mortgage Co. of London, Ltd.
47 F. 550 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia, 1891)
Neal v. Murphey & Co.
60 Ga. 388 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Ga. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgregor-v-matthis-ga-1861.