McGregor v. Matthis
This text of 32 Ga. 417 (McGregor v. Matthis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[418]*418 By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
From the time that Crumpton transferred the note to Fi.eld and Lemon, he ceased to have any interest in the land, (Tompkins vs. Williams, 19th Ga. Reports, 569,) and the deed being executed to Shelton afterwards, can make no difference. In the case of Ware ?against Jackson, (19th Georgia Reports, 452,) one of the Court who gave the majority opinion in that case, said, “ Had the note been transferred by Baker, (the vendor,) for a valuable consideration, to a bona fide holder, the case would have been different.” Indeed, in the case supposed, the Court would doubtless have been concurrent. That is this case'.
Let the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Ga. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgregor-v-matthis-ga-1861.