McGraw v. Shapiro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McGraw v. Shapiro

56 A.D.2d 624, 391 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10721

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 56 A.D.2d 624 (McGraw v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGraw v. Shapiro, 56 A.D.2d 624, 391 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to enjoin respondents from transferring petitioner, an employee of the Nassau County Department of Mental Health, to a new facility, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 15, 1976, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without ■ costs or disbursements. A review of the record shows no abuse of discretion by Special Term in denying petitioner the extraordinary remedy sought, which generally does not lie to prevent administrative acts (see Matter of Dati v Gallagher, 68 Misc 2d 692, 694). Petitioner may, of course, pursue her grievances before the appropriate administrative bodies. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to enjoin respondents from transferring petitioner, an employee of the Nassau County Department of Mental Health, to a new facility, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 15, 1976, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without ■ costs or disbursements. A review of the record shows no abuse of discretion by Special Term in denying petitioner the extraordinary remedy sought, which generally does not lie to prevent administrative acts (see Matter of Dati v Gallagher, 68 Misc 2d 692, 694). Petitioner may, of course, pursue her grievances before the appropriate administrative bodies. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 624, 391 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgraw-v-shapiro-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack