McGraw v. McGraw

Missouri Court of Appeals

McGraw v. McGraw

456 S.W.3d 886, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 295, 2015 WL 1244938

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 17, 2015·No. WD 77237·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Eric McGraw appeals the judgment of the trial court granting Gwynne McGraw’s motion to dismiss Eric McGraw’s petition in equity to correct, reform, and prohibit enforcement of a dissolution judgment. On appeal Eric McGraw argues the trial court erred in dismissing his petition because Gwynne McGraw’s motion to dismiss did not comply with Rule 55.27 and because his claim was not barred by res judicata in that it had not been fully adjudicated. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Eric McGraw appeals the judgment of the trial court granting Gwynne McGraw’s motion to dismiss Eric McGraw’s petition in equity to correct, reform, and prohibit enforcement of a dissolution judgment. On appeal Eric McGraw argues the trial court erred in dismissing his petition because Gwynne McGraw’s motion to dismiss did not comply with Rule 55.27 and because his claim was not barred by res judicata in that it had not been fully adjudicated. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

McGraw v. McGraw, 456 S.W.3d 886, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 295, 2015 WL 1244938 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

456 S.W.3d 886 (McGraw v. McGraw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.