McGraw v. McGraw

176 F. 312, 99 C.C.A. 650, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 4, 1910
DocketNo. 1,952
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 176 F. 312 (McGraw v. McGraw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGraw v. McGraw, 176 F. 312, 99 C.C.A. 650, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252 (6th Cir. 1910).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bill to remove a cloud cast upon the title to certain property to which complainant claims title as heir at law as not validly claimed under the will of Thos. McGraw, though claimed thereunder by some of the defendants. The cause came on to be heard upon demurrers to the bill, which were sustained, and the bill dismissed bjr the court below.

This court upon full consideration sees no error in the decree below, and is content to affirm upon the opinion of Circuit Justice ITarlan, who heard the case below in connection with District Judge Swan.

Judge BURTON participated in the hearing and decision of this case, while a member of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rudolph v. Schmalstig
25 Ohio Law. Abs. 249 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, 1937)
Estate of Rider
251 P. 799 (California Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 F. 312, 99 C.C.A. 650, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgraw-v-mcgraw-ca6-1910.