McGrath v. Wark & Co.

E.D. Pennsylvania

McGrath v. Wark & Co.

41 F. Supp. 18, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2598

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided October 9, 1941·No. Civ. A. No. 1469·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KALODNER, District Judge.

The motion to dismiss must be granted. The case of Swartz v. Conradis, 298 Pa. 343, 148 A. 529, is dispositive of the issue.

[19]*19See also Venezia v. Philadelphia Electric Company, 317 Pa. 557, 177 A. 25; Billo v. Allegheny Steel Company, 328 Pa. 97, 195 A. 110.

The plaintiff, who was employed by a subcontractor, is seeking to recover damages from the general contractor, for injuries suffered in the course of his employment.

The accident occurred in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania law applies. Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, 114 A.L.R. 1487.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KALODNER, District Judge.

The motion to dismiss must be granted. The case of Swartz v. Conradis, 298 Pa. 343, 148 A. 529, is dispositive of the issue.

[19]*19See also Venezia v. Philadelphia Electric Company, 317 Pa. 557, 177 A. 25; Billo v. Allegheny Steel Company, 328 Pa. 97, 195 A. 110.

The plaintiff, who was employed by a subcontractor, is seeking to recover damages from the general contractor, for injuries suffered in the course of his employment.

The accident occurred in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania law applies. Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, 114 A.L.R. 1487.

McGrath v. Wark & Co., 41 F. Supp. 18, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2598 (E.D. Pa. 1941).

Pincite

41 F. Supp. 18 (McGrath v. Wark & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related