McGrath v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-0275V
Filed: January 7, 2016
Unpublished
**************************** MAUREEN MCGRATH, *
*
Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
* Tetanus, Diphtheria, Pertussis (“Tdap”) * Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”); AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
*
Respondent. *
*
**************************** Isaiah Kalinowski, Maglio Christopher Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Alexis Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On March 17, 2015, Maureen McGrath filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered “injuries resulting from adverse effects” of her August 28, 2012 Tdap vaccination, including a tendon tear, and left shoulder pain. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 3, 7. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.
On August 11, 2015, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). On January 7, 2016, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $82,438.44 in actual and projected pain and suffering and $2,561.56 in past unreimbursable expenses for a total award of $85,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Additionally, petitioner’s counsel filed a notice reiterating that petitioner accepts respondent’s proffer. (ECF 31). Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner $82,438.44 in actual and projected pain and suffering and $2,561.56 in past unreimbursable expenses for a lump sum payment of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Maureen McGrath. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Case 1:15-vv-00275-UNJ Document 30 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
)
MAUREEN MCGRATH, )
)
Petitioner, )
) No. 15-275
v. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey )
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
__________________________________________)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER OF DAMAGES
I. Items of Compensation
For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine-related” is as described in
Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report filed on August 10, 2015.
A. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $82,438.44 in actual and projected
pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and suffering has been
reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents her expenditure of past unreimbursable
expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $2,561.56. Petitioner agrees.
C. Lost Wages
The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, petitioner’s vaccine-related
injury has not impaired her earning capacity. Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner
Case 1:15-vv-00275-UNJ Document 30 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 2
should be awarded no lost future earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a lump sum payment of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 1 This
amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which
petitioner would be entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
VINCENT J. MATANOSKI Deputy Director Tort Branch, Civil Division
ALTHEA W. DAVIS Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division
s/ Alexis B. Babcock ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Dated: January 7, 2016 Telephone: (202) 616-7678
1 Should petitioner die before the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain and suffering.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McGrath v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (McGrath v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.