McGrath v. Cornelius

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McGrath v. Cornelius

30 A.D.2d 732, 291 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3578

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 27, 1968·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

Respondent having failed either to file and serve an answer or to move with respect to the petition upon objections in point of law, the proceeding is remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the provisions of CPLR 7804 (subd. [e]) and, if Special Term be so advised, for further remittal to respondent Superintendent for reconsideration of his determination in accordance with the rule of Matter of Wallace v. Murphy (21 N Y 2d 433). Were the proceeding properly before us on the present record, we would confirm the determination. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court.

Respondent having failed either to file and serve an answer or to move with respect to the petition upon objections in point of law, the proceeding is remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the provisions of CPLR 7804 (subd. [e]) and, if Special Term be so advised, for further remittal to respondent Superintendent for reconsideration of his determination in accordance with the rule of Matter of Wallace v. Murphy (21 N Y 2d 433). Were the proceeding properly before us on the present record, we would confirm the determination. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

McGrath v. Cornelius, 30 A.D.2d 732, 291 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3578 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

30 A.D.2d 732 (McGrath v. Cornelius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related