McGrath v. Coonrod

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McGrath v. Coonrod

277 A.D.2d 926

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 926 (McGrath v. Coonrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGrath v. Coonrod, 277 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiffs have joined in this appeal from separate judgments in the Supreme Court, Sullivan County, in favor of the defendant, each entered in the office of the Clerk of Sullivan County on December 1, 1949, after a consolidated jury trial of the actions. The two decedents were killed while- riding as passengers in a motor vehicle owned by the defendant and operated by one Woods. There was a conflict of evidence as to whether or not Woods was operating the vehicle with the consent of the defendant. There was also evidence from which the jury could have found that the accident resulted from drinking on the part of the driver, of which the passengers had knowledge. Only questions of fact were involved, and they were properly submitted to the jury. Judgments unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiffs have joined in this appeal from separate judgments in the Supreme Court, Sullivan County, in favor of the defendant, each entered in the office of the Clerk of Sullivan County on December 1, 1949, after a consolidated jury trial of the actions. The two decedents were killed while- riding as passengers in a motor vehicle owned by the defendant and operated by one Woods. There was a conflict of evidence as to whether or not Woods was operating the vehicle with the consent of the defendant. There was also evidence from which the jury could have found that the accident resulted from drinking on the part of the driver, of which the passengers had knowledge. Only questions of fact were involved, and they were properly submitted to the jury. Judgments unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgrath-v-coonrod-nyappdiv-1950.