McGowan v. Supreme Council of Catholic Mutual Benefit Ass'n

28 N.Y.S. 177, 76 Hun 534, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 534, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 268
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 12, 1894·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BRADLEY, J.

The plaintiff’s son, Richard B. McGowan, became a member of the Holy Angels Branch, No. 7, of the defendant, and certificate of membership was issued to him May 7, 1888. It was to the effect that he was entitled to all the rights and privileges of membership in the defendant, and to participate in the beneficiary fund of the association to the amount of $2,000, which should, at his death, be paid to his mother, the plaintiff. The certificate, by its terms, was issued upon the condition that Richard B. McGowan should, in every particular, while a member, comply with all the laws, rules, and requirements of the association. The defendant was incorporated by chapter 496, Laws 1879, in which it was provided that the corporation should have power to make such constitution, by-laws, rules, and regulations as it should judge proper for regulating and fixing the amount and time of payment of all fees, dues, and funds of the corporation, and for its grand council and branches, and that they, respectively, as well as the defendant, should have the power of suspending any of its members (section 3); [178] that it should be lawful for the association to create, hold, and disburse a beneficiary fund sufficient to pay all losses and expenses incident to the corporation, and for the relief of members, and their families, of the branches and grand councils (section 6); and that such beneficiary fund as may be deemed suitable may be set apart, and provided to be paid over to the families, heirs, or representatives of deceased members, or to such person as they may, while living, have directed; and that the collecting, managing, and disbursements, as well as the term and manner of payments on the death of a member, shall be regulated by the constitution, by-laws, rules, and regulations of the corporation (section 7).

The alleged defense is that Richard B. McGowan was in default in payment of assessment known as “Number 18,” made in January, 1892, and, as the consequence, was suspended from the rights of membership, and remained so at the time of his death. It appears that such an assessment was made, and that he became in default. The main question is whether, as against him, the assessment was legally made. This is matter of defense. It appears that it was the custom to keep the amount of an assessment in advance, so far as it was practicable to do it, so that, when a call from the grand lodge to pay beneficiaries on the death of members should be made, the branches could, without the delay attending the taking of the assessments made on account of such deaths, remit the amount, through the proper channel, to the depository of the defendant, for distribution among the beneficiaries. In practical effect, therefore, the payment of the assessments was a reimbursement of the respective branches preparatory to another call from the defendant for a like purpose. This method was permitted by the fact that, on initiation, each member was required to pay the branch in which he was received one beneficiary assessment. This initiation fee was paid by McGowan, and it may be assumed that he had paid all assessments made upon him prior to No. 18. The plaintiff challenges that one for the reason that he, by the payment of them, including that paid at the time of initiation, had already contributed an assessment to the payment of the beneficiaries on account of whom the call was made, and that he could not be legally assessed to contribute to a beneficiary fund which might be required by future deaths of members, because such an assessment was not within the provisions of his contract of membership. „ While it is true that be could not properly be assessed to pay the beneficiaries of members resulting from death which had not occurred, such in fact was not the assessment which the plaintiff seeks to repudiate. The constitution of the defendant provides that:

“The supreme recorder shall at the first of each month, or as soon thereafter as possible, issue one or two assessments, as may be required, to pay beneficiaries of deceased members then on record in his office, and shall notify the grand secretary of each grand council, and the recording secretary of each branch in his immediate jurisdiction, of the same. Said notice shall contain the name of the deceased members, the number and location of the branch, date of death, cause of death, date of initiation, amount of certificate, and shall also state the death, if any, upon said notice, that will be paid with surplus.” Section 7.

[179] It then provides for assessments and notice, to contain the statements mentioned in section 7 (section 9), and, further, that all moneys so paid by members shall be retained by the treasurer of the branch until call is made, and that the money so collected shall be remitted, etc. (section 1). The assessment No. 18 conformed to the requirements before mentioned, was dated January 6, 1892, the notice annexed to it was dated January 11, 1892, and it was served upon McGowan by mail, on the day of the date of the nbtice. It may be observed that monthly assessments are provided for, and they are made to pay the beneficiaries of deceased members mentioned in it. Such was the assessment in question. It thus necessarily appears „tliat the beneficiary fund produced by the payment of the initiation fees of members is held as a reserve, except so far as it may be reduced by payments required to be made by surplus. This, evidently, is the policy of the corporation, as it is required to make an assessment early in each month to meet the demands of beneficiaries, arising from deaths of members reported since that of preceding month. The purpose for which assessment is made, rather than the fund from which it is paid, is the important fact bearing upon its legitimacy; and inasmuch as the branch is permitted to have a reserve beneficiary fund, originating from the payment of the initiation fee, it is quite unimportant, for the purpose of the question here, whether compliance with the call upon it is delayed until the assessments are paid in, or, in anticipation of the receipt of them, the amount is paid from that fund, and remitted without such delay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGowan v. Supreme Council of Catholic Mutual Benefit Ass'n, 28 N.Y.S. 177, 76 Hun 534, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 534, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 268 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

28 N.Y.S. 177 (McGowan v. Supreme Council of Catholic Mutual Benefit Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pagel, Horton & Co. v. Harmon Paper Co.
236 A.D. 47 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Montgomery v. Harker
84 N.W. 369 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1900)