McGowan v. State

11 S.W. 112, 27 Tex. Ct. App. 183, 1889 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 22
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 2, 1889
DocketNo. 2527
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 S.W. 112 (McGowan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGowan v. State, 11 S.W. 112, 27 Tex. Ct. App. 183, 1889 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 22 (Tex. Ct. App. 1889).

Opinion

Hurt, Judge.

This is a conviction for theft of hogs, with imprisonment in jail twenty-four hours and a fine of ten dollars as the punishment.

The hogs were alleged to be the property of M. G. Dickie. The evidence leaves the issue, as to whether the hogs belonged to Dickie or the defendant, quite evenly balanced. But, concede that they were the property of Dickie, the proof fails to show the fraudulent intent. On the contrary, the facts clearly present a case in which the defendant, if not the owner of the hogs, certainly believed himself to be, and took them so believing.

The verdict is not supported by the evidence, and for this reason the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. S. Sandel v. State
97 S.W.2d 225 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Moran v. State
249 S.W. 474 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 S.W. 112, 27 Tex. Ct. App. 183, 1889 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgowan-v-state-texapp-1889.