McGowan v. County of Kern

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 19, 2020·No. 1:15-cv-01365·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 MARK MCGOWAN, individually and as No. 1:15-cv-01365-DAD-SKO successor-in-interest to Nancy Joyce 12 Garrett, deceased; DEBORAH BLANCO, individually and as successor-in-interest to 13 ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF Nancy Joyce Garrett, COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 Plaintiffs, (Doc. 125) 15 v. 16

COUNTY OF KERN, a municipality; 17 NICHOLAS JOHN CLERICO, an 18 individual; and DOES 1-100,

19 Defendants.

20 21 On March 18, 2020, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 22 prejudice. (Doc. 125.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see 23 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and 24 has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Sheila K. Oberto 27 Dated: March 18, 2020 /s/ . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGowan v. County of Kern, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

McGowan v. County of Kern (McGowan v. County of Kern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)