McGowan v. Cosmopolitan Bank & Trust Co.
This text of 169 N.E. 574 (McGowan v. Cosmopolitan Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action was brought in the common pleas court of Hamilton county by the Cosmopolitan Bank & Trust Company to recover the amount due on a promissory note, signed upon its face by Robert B. McGowan and Carolina L. McGowan as joint makers. The signatures are admitted. Claim was made by answer that Carolina L. McGowan signed the note as an accommodation maker only, and that such fact was known by the plaintiff at the time of delivery thereof, and by cross-petition a claim was asserted for $5,000 for services rendered to the plaintiff by Robert B. McGowan on express contract.
The trial court, upon objection made, excluded evidence as to the relationship of Carolina L. McGowan to the note and also evidence respecting the claim of Robert B. McGowan for services. The *504 court then directed a verdict for plaintiff for the full amount due on the note and rendered judgment accordingly. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed upon authority of Richards v. Market Exchange Bank Co., 81 Ohio St., 348, 90 N. E., 1000, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.), 99, and cases there cited.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 N.E. 574, 121 Ohio St. 503, 121 Ohio St. (N.S.) 503, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgowan-v-cosmopolitan-bank-trust-co-ohio-1929.