McGowan v. City of Eugene

Court of Appeals of Oregon

McGowan v. City of Eugene

795 P.2d 563, 102 Or. App. 512, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 637

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 18, 1990·No. 89-078; CA A62779·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s affirmance of the City of Eugene’s rezoning of a 29-acre area. The city allowed the zone change after the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission ordered the annexation of the area to the city. Petitioners also sought our review of the boundary commission’s annexation order. In McGowan v. Lane County Local Govt. Bdry. Comm., 102 Or App 381, 795 P2d 560 (1990), we affirmed the annexation order.

Petitioners’ arguments for reversing LUBA’s decision are without merit and do not require discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s affirmance of the City of Eugene’s rezoning of a 29-acre area. The city allowed the zone change after the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission ordered the annexation of the area to the city. Petitioners also sought our review of the boundary commission’s annexation order. In McGowan v. Lane County Local Govt. Bdry. Comm., 102 Or App 381, 795 P2d 560 (1990), we affirmed the annexation order.

Petitioners’ arguments for reversing LUBA’s decision are without merit and do not require discussion.

Affirmed.

McGowan v. City of Eugene, 795 P.2d 563, 102 Or. App. 512, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 637 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

795 P.2d 563 (McGowan v. City of Eugene) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related