McGowan v. City of Coatesville

79 Pa. Super. 255, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 226
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 17, 1922·No. Appeal, No. 205·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

Every disputed question of fact was carefully submitted by the trial judge for the consideration of the jury. The verdict returned was fully warranted by the evidence.

The reasons given for refusing a judgment n. o. v. are a complete answer to appellant’s argument on this appeal.

The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGowan v. City of Coatesville, 79 Pa. Super. 255, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 226 (Pa. Ct. App. 1922).

79 Pa. Super. 255 (McGowan v. City of Coatesville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schwabenland v. Philadelphia
182 A. 497 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)