McGovern v. O'Connor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McGovern v. O'Connor

256 A.D.2d 501, 682 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13678

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 256 A.D.2d 501 (McGovern v. O'Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGovern v. O'Connor, 256 A.D.2d 501, 682 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated September 29, 1997, as denied their cross motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In order to avoid a dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c), it is necessary for a plaintiff to demonstrate (1) an excuse for his failure to apply for a default judgment for over a year, and (2) the existence of a meritorious cause of action (Rendelman v Southside Hosp., 141 AD2d 521). The defendants do not argue that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the existence of a meritorious cause of action, and the record reveals that the plaintiff did make such a showing. In addition, the plaintiff demonstrated a sufficient excuse for his failure to apply for a default judgment for over a year. Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Mc-Ginity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated September 29, 1997, as denied their cross motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In order to avoid a dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c), it is necessary for a plaintiff to demonstrate (1) an excuse for his failure to apply for a default judgment for over a year, and (2) the existence of a meritorious cause of action (Rendelman v Southside Hosp., 141 AD2d 521). The defendants do not argue that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the existence of a meritorious cause of action, and the record reveals that the plaintiff did make such a showing. In addition, the plaintiff demonstrated a sufficient excuse for his failure to apply for a default judgment for over a year. Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Mc-Ginity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 501, 682 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgovern-v-oconnor-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack