McGovern v. McGovern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McGovern v. McGovern

254 A.D. 765, 6 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7526

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 765 (McGovern v. McGovern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGovern v. McGovern, 254 A.D. 765, 6 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding brought by the petitioner, here respondent, in the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York — Family Court, Kings County — against her husband, respondent in the court below and here appellant, for an order directing support of the petitioner and her three infant children., an order was entered directing the husband to pay into court twenty-two dollars weekly for such support, and awarding alternative relief. Subsequently the husband moved, on affidavit and notice, to set aside the order and for a new trial. An order denying his motion was thereafter entered. From each order the husband appeals. Orders unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding brought by the petitioner, here respondent, in the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York — Family Court, Kings County — against her husband, respondent in the court below and here appellant, for an order directing support of the petitioner and her three infant children., an order was entered directing the husband to pay into court twenty-two dollars weekly for such support, and awarding alternative relief. Subsequently the husband moved, on affidavit and notice, to set aside the order and for a new trial. An order denying his motion was thereafter entered. From each order the husband appeals. Orders unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 765, 6 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgovern-v-mcgovern-nyappdiv-1938.