McGoohan v. Weaver

New York Supreme Court

McGoohan v. Weaver

15 Misc. 2d 519, 183 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3301

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 20, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 Misc. 2d 519 (McGoohan v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGoohan v. Weaver, 15 Misc. 2d 519, 183 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3301 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Walter R. Hart, J.

While the court is of the view (as developed in Matter of Silberman v. Weaver, 12 Misc 2d 895; State Rent and Eviction Regulations, § 11) that respondent is in error in holding that the conversion of a one-family house into a three-family dwelling where the necessary plans are filed and the work requisite to procuring a certificate of occupancy has been completed, does not create additional housing accommodations where the space was theretofore occupied illegally as a multiple dwelling, the record before the court in the instant proceeding is not clear as to the nature of the work performed in the subject apartment. Under the circumstances, the court may not hold as a matter of law that there were structural changes therein.

The matter is, therefore, remitted to respondent to determine what structural changes, if any, were made on the second floor to render it a self-contained unit.

Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter R. Hart, J.

While the court is of the view (as developed in Matter of Silberman v. Weaver, 12 Misc 2d 895; State Rent and Eviction Regulations, § 11) that respondent is in error in holding that the conversion of a one-family house into a three-family dwelling where the necessary plans are filed and the work requisite to procuring a certificate of occupancy has been completed, does not create additional housing accommodations where the space was theretofore occupied illegally as a multiple dwelling, the record before the court in the instant proceeding is not clear as to the nature of the work performed in the subject apartment. Under the circumstances, the court may not hold as a matter of law that there were structural changes therein.

The matter is, therefore, remitted to respondent to determine what structural changes, if any, were made on the second floor to render it a self-contained unit.

Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Misc. 2d 519, 183 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgoohan-v-weaver-nysupct-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack