McGoodwin's Assignee v. Finn

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

McGoodwin's Assignee v. Finn

150 S.W. 77, 150 Ky. 26, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 867

Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided October 16, 1912·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Winn —

Affirming,

This is a companion case to the case of Mrs. Eva Walker v. J. J. Milliken, as assignee of J. A. McGfoodwin, this day decided. As is recited in the statement of fact in the opinion in that case, the only difference in the facts between Mrs. Finn’s case and Mrs. Walker’s case is that the writing executed in favor of Mrs. Finn was never delivered to her at all — a stronger position than that in which Mrs. Walker stood. The trial court found upon this state of fact that Mrs. Finn was entitled to a [27] preference. From that judgment J. A. McGoodwin’s assignee appeals.

The judgment is affirmed upon the reasoning of the Walker case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Winn —

Affirming,

This is a companion case to the case of Mrs. Eva Walker v. J. J. Milliken, as assignee of J. A. McGfoodwin, this day decided. As is recited in the statement of fact in the opinion in that case, the only difference in the facts between Mrs. Finn’s case and Mrs. Walker’s case is that the writing executed in favor of Mrs. Finn was never delivered to her at all — a stronger position than that in which Mrs. Walker stood. The trial court found upon this state of fact that Mrs. Finn was entitled to a [27] preference. From that judgment J. A. McGoodwin’s assignee appeals.

The judgment is affirmed upon the reasoning of the Walker case.

McGoodwin's Assignee v. Finn, 150 S.W. 77, 150 Ky. 26, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 867 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

150 S.W. 77 (McGoodwin's Assignee v. Finn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.