McGonigle v. Susquehanna Mutual Fire Insurance

31 A. 875, 168 Pa. 1, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 750
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 29, 1895
DocketAppeal, Nos. 455 and 478
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 31 A. 875 (McGonigle v. Susquehanna Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGonigle v. Susquehanna Mutual Fire Insurance, 31 A. 875, 168 Pa. 1, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 750 (Pa. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

There appears to be no substantial error either in the learned referee’s findings of fact or in his conclusions of law. His very able and exhaustive report is an ample vindication of his rulings. There was therefore no error in overruling the exceptions and directing judgment for plaintiff in accordance with the referee’s findings.

Judgment affirmed.

MCGONIGLE V. AURORA EIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Per Curiam, April 29, 1895 :

By writing, signed by counsel for the parties and filed in this case, it was agreed that the decision to be rendered in Patrick McGonigle v. Susquehanna Mut. Fire Insurance Co., No. 455, January term, 1895, shall control and determine the appeal in this case, and be decisive of all questions arising out of the same.

[16]*16In an opinion, just filed in that ease, the judgment has been affirmed; and pursuant to the terms of said agreement the judgment in this case should also be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Meyers (Et Al.)
52 A.2d 375 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Blaustein v. Standard Oil Co.
45 A.2d 527 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1945)
Woods v. Spoturno
183 A. 319 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1936)
McLaughlin v. Bahre
166 A. 800 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1933)
Rathblott v. Royal Indemnity Co.
164 A. 718 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Isaac v. Donegal & Conoy Mut. Fire Ins.
162 A. 300 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
In re Dukes
276 F. 724 (D. Delaware, 1921)
Hawley v. Isaacson
200 P. 1109 (Washington Supreme Court, 1921)
Morgan v. Ownbey
100 A. 411 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1916)
Western Nat. Ins. v. Marsh
125 P. 1094 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. Marsh
1912 OK 302 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Lutz v. Roberts Cotton Oil Co.
82 A. 601 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1912)
Leisen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
127 N.W. 837 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1910)
Pearce Manufacturing Co. v. Lebanon Mutual Insurance
65 A. 663 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Kompa v. Franklin Fire Insurance
28 Pa. Super. 425 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Carnes v. Farmers' Fire Insurance
20 Pa. Super. 634 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. Bradford
102 F. 45 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania, 1899)
Jacoby v. Westchester Fire Insurance
10 Pa. Super. 171 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A. 875, 168 Pa. 1, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgonigle-v-susquehanna-mutual-fire-insurance-pa-1895.