McGonagle v. Chaffee Auto Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

McGonagle v. Chaffee Auto Co.

272 P. 257, 47 Idaho 32, 1928 Ida. LEXIS 47

Idaho Supreme Court·Decided November 22, 1928·No. No. 4983.·Published

Opinions

This action was brought against the defendants, as copartners, doing business under the firm name of Chaffee Auto Company. The allegation of partnership was admitted. The jury's verdict was "for *Page 33 the plaintiff, and against the defendants." The clerk inadvertently entered the judgment against "the Chaffee Auto Company, a corporation."

A careful consideration of the entire record, as tested by the assignments of error, has convinced us that the judgment should be affirmed.

It is therefore ordered, that with the substitution of Geo. E. Chaffee and R.G. Rowe, for "the Chaffee Auto Company, a corporation," the judgment is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action was brought against the defendants, as copartners, doing business under the firm name of Chaffee Auto Company. The allegation of partnership was admitted. The jury's verdict was "for *Page 33 the plaintiff, and against the defendants." The clerk inadvertently entered the judgment against "the Chaffee Auto Company, a corporation."

A careful consideration of the entire record, as tested by the assignments of error, has convinced us that the judgment should be affirmed.

It is therefore ordered, that with the substitution of Geo. E. Chaffee and R.G. Rowe, for "the Chaffee Auto Company, a corporation," the judgment is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

McGonagle v. Chaffee Auto Co., 272 P. 257, 47 Idaho 32, 1928 Ida. LEXIS 47 (Idaho 1928).

Pincite

272 P. 257 (McGonagle v. Chaffee Auto Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.