McGonagle v. Chaffee Auto Co.

272 P. 257, 47 Idaho 32, 1928 Ida. LEXIS 47
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 22, 1928
DocketNo. 4983.
StatusPublished

This text of 272 P. 257 (McGonagle v. Chaffee Auto Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGonagle v. Chaffee Auto Co., 272 P. 257, 47 Idaho 32, 1928 Ida. LEXIS 47 (Idaho 1928).

Opinions

This action was brought against the defendants, as copartners, doing business under the firm name of Chaffee Auto Company. The allegation of partnership was admitted. The jury's verdict was "for *Page 33 the plaintiff, and against the defendants." The clerk inadvertently entered the judgment against "the Chaffee Auto Company, a corporation."

A careful consideration of the entire record, as tested by the assignments of error, has convinced us that the judgment should be affirmed.

It is therefore ordered, that with the substitution of Geo. E. Chaffee and R.G. Rowe, for "the Chaffee Auto Company, a corporation," the judgment is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 P. 257, 47 Idaho 32, 1928 Ida. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgonagle-v-chaffee-auto-co-idaho-1928.