McGlynn v. Ellis
123 A. 373, 102 N.J.L. 729, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 316
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McGlynn v. Ellis, 123 A. 373, 102 N.J.L. 729, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 316 (N.J. 1923).
123 A. 373 (McGlynn v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rigney v. Swingley
113 P.2d 344 (Montana Supreme Court, 1941)