McGlynn v. Billings

16 Vt. 329
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedSeptember 15, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 16 Vt. 329 (McGlynn v. Billings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGlynn v. Billings, 16 Vt. 329 (Vt. 1844).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by.

Williams, Ch. J.

The court consider that the acceptance by the plaintiff of the order on Slason, after the declarations made by the defendant in his presence, was a discharge in full of his account; and the decision of the auditor to this effect was right. The proposition, on the part of the defendant, to give this sum does not [332]*332appear to have been founded on the balance as ascertained, but was an offer of a certain sum as a settlement. Having this view of the case, it is not necessary to say any thing in relation to the account. The examination of the account by the auditor appears to have been unnecessary.

It is very possible, and highly probable, that a different result might have been had, if the mistake in adding the account of the defendant, which is now for the first time discovered, had been known on the trial before the auditor. For, if it had appeared that the offer was made and accepted on the mistaken supposition of both that the defendant’s account was $145,20, when in fact it was only $135,20, the acceptance might not have been obligatory on the plaintiff. As a court, sitting to examine ,the proceedings of the county court in matters of law only, we oannot have any reference whatever to the account, whether correctly added or not.

The judgment of the county court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Stevens & Adams
52 A. 1034 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1902)
Pollman & Bros. Coal & Sprinkling Co. v. City of St. Louis
47 S.W. 563 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
Storch v. Dewey
46 P. 698 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1896)
Tanner v. Merrill
31 L.R.A. 171 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)
Vermont State Baptist Convention v. Ladd
58 Vt. 95 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1886)
Springfield & Memphis Railroad v. Allen
46 Ark. 217 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1885)
Burrill v. Parsons
73 Me. 286 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1882)
Calkins v. State
13 Wis. 389 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1861)
McDaniels v. President of the Bank of Rutland
29 Vt. 230 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1857)
Cole v. Champlain Transportation Co.
26 Vt. 87 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1853)
McDaniels v. Lapham
21 Vt. 222 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1849)
Miller v. Holden
18 Vt. 337 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1846)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Vt. 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcglynn-v-billings-vt-1844.