McGlothen v. Sony Electronics, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

McGlothen v. Sony Electronics, Inc.

63 F. App'x 411

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 20, 2003

DocketNo. 02-56765

StatusPublished

This text of 63 F. App'x 411 (McGlothen v. Sony Electronics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGlothen v. Sony Electronics, Inc., 63 F. App'x 411 (9th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Sheri Young McGlothen appeals pro se the district court’s order denying her motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to set aside the judgment in her libel action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, SEC v. Coldicutt, 258 F.3d 939, 941 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm because none of the applicable grounds for relief exists, see School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993).

We deny appellee’s request for costs and fees without prejudice to the filing of such a motion in accordance with Fed. R.App. P. 38 and Ninth Circuit Rule 39-1.6.

We decline appellee’s request to impose a prefiling review order against McGlothen at the appellate level.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI