McGlocklin v. State
This text of McGlocklin v. State (McGlocklin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 3, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________
No. 3D16-2466 Lower Tribunal No. 00-19296 ________________
Mike McGlocklin, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, Judge.
Mike McGlocklin, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Marlon J. Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, SALTER, and LUCK, JJ.
SUAREZ, J.
Mike McGlocklin appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for
habeas corpus. We affirm, and order the defendant to show cause why he should
not be prohibited from filing future pro se motions. McGlocklin was convicted in 2003 of arson, attempted first degree murder,
attempted felony murder, and two counts of child abuse with no harm. On direct
appeal, this Court reversed and remanded to vacate the attempted felony murder
conviction on double jeopardy grounds, and affirmed all other grounds raised on
appeal. McGlocklin v. State, 907 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). In 2016, the
appellant filed a successive post-conviction petition styled as a writ of habeas for
errors in the trial that he asserted were manifestly unjust. The trial court treated the
petition as a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and
denied it as untimely and successive, and additionally concluded that it raised
issues that should have been raised on direct appeal. We agree and affirm.1
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
We note that the trial court has barred McGlocklin from further pro se
pleadings, petitions, and motions in the underlying case, number F00-19296. We
thus order McGlocklin to show cause within thirty (30) days why he should not be
barred from filing further pro se motions and appeals in this Court relating to the
convictions and sentences in the underlying case unless represented by a Florida
Bar certified attorney.
Affirmed; order to show cause issued.
1 The mandate affirming McGlocklin's convictions was issued in August, 2005. McGlocklin's instant motion was filed on June 27, 2016, well beyond the two-year limitation imposed by Rule 3.850(b). Thus, his motion is clearly untimely. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McGlocklin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcglocklin-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.